amos vogel, film as a subversive art (1974)

it was marx who, when asked in an interview to characterize the meaning of life in a single word, unhesitatingly replied: “struggle.” was it a slip of the tongue that prevented him from limiting this definition to life ‘under capitalism,’ thus giving it the historical dimension he gave to every other phenomena? or was it not rather his realization, so often expressed in his philosophical writings, that the essence of life, under all circumstances and in all societies, was eternal change, the constant transformation of all forms and systems?

it is in this sense that the subject of this book will always remain on the agenda, and that these pages are but a rough draft; for the subject of this book is human freedom, and its guardians, at all times and under all conditions, are the subversives.

filmas

I think..

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s